Remember our Wayne’s tireless refrain on the economy?
That investment (mostly from China) in our resources sector will ensure a budget back in surplus (for one year), and “lasting prosperity” via an endless “boom”?
Remember how he remains ignorant of all the many warnings about China?
(And, about our second largest trading partner, Japan?)
Including this one, just before the May budget:
“The market is telling you that something is not quite right,” Faber, the publisher of the Gloom, Boom & Doom report, said in a Bloomberg Television interview in Hong Kong today. “The Chinese economy is going to slow down regardless. It is more likely that we will even have a crash sometime in the next nine to 12 months.”
Faber joins hedge fund manager Jim Chanos and Harvard University’s Kenneth Rogoff in warning of a crash in China.
China is “on a treadmill to hell” because it’s hooked on property development for driving growth, Chanos said in an interview last month. As much as 60 percent of the country’s gross domestic product relies on construction, he said. Rogoff said in February a debt-fueled bubble in China may trigger a regional recession within a decade.
Remember the devastating critique of the May budget by Macquarie Research? The one that said Wayne’s (ie, Treasury’s) forecasts for business investment – the key assumption underpinning all the budget projections – are “truly extraordinary”?
Upbeat growth forecasts from the Treasury and the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) are based on very optimistic forecasts for private sector business investment.
The RBA and Treasury forecasts for business investment over the next couple of years are truly extraordinary.
In our opinion, achieving such stratospheric growth would be extremely difficult.
By putting all their eggs in the mining investment basket, policymakers appear to have no Plan B for what will support the economy if investment disappoints. And this note provides three clear reasons why one should be cautious about counting those mining investment chickens before they are hatched.
Well, on July 4 the international ratings agency Moody’s – the same one that has downgraded our banks and effectively declared them “Too Big To Fail – dropped another bomb on Wayne’s parade.
It says that 10% or more of Chinese GDP is bad debt, and claims that the “China debt problem (is) bigger than stated”.
From Moody’s Investors Service, via ZeroHedge (emphasis added):
Moody’s Investors Service says that the potential scale of the problem loans at Chinese banks may be closer to its stress case than its base case, according to an assessment that the rating agency conducted following the release of new data by China’s National Audit Office (NAO).
Since these loans to local governments are not covered by the NAO report, this means they are not considered by the audit agency as real claims on local governments. This indicates that these loans are most likely poorly documented and may pose the greatest risk of delinquency,” the analyst adds.
Moody’s report estimates that the Chinese banking system’s economic non-performing loans could reach between 8% and 12% of total loans, compared to 5% to 8% in the rating agency’s base case, and 10% to 18% in its stress case.
But it’s not just Moody’s now warning about China’s banking system.
From MarketWatch (emphasis added):
China’s debt woes point to bank bailout
China’s banking system will require an eventual bailout by the central government, according to some analysts, who said figures released last week on the size of local-government borrowings point to the need for a rescue.
Credit Suisse economist Dong Tao said the numbers backed up concerns he’s been voicing for the past two years on China’s toxic loan problem.
“Ultimately, we believe that the central government will need to separate the local government’s bank debt from banks’ balance sheets and recapitalize the banks,” Tao said in a note following the release of data on China’s local-debt obligations by the National Audit Office.
Reuters reported last month that Beijing is considering a bailout that could see the central government accept to 2 trillion to 3 trillion yuan of local governments’ outstanding debt in an effort to ensure against a mass default, which could bring down the economy. See report on China’s initial bailout plans.
Stress is building within the system, Tao said, as local governments face a growing pile of debts coming due at a time of declining land sales, normally a key revenue stream for the provincial authorities.
Meanwhile, local governments are also having trouble finding new sources of lending as state-controlled banks grow increasingly wary of their deteriorating ability to service existing debt.
Standard Chartered said last week there were early signs of major financial distress building at the local government level.
Anecdotes of local-government investment vehicles in Shanghai and in Yunnan province struggling to meet loan payments “signal the beginning of the wave of difficulties,” Standard Chartered’s China economist Stephen Green said in a note Thursday.
And Bloomberg reports that both Fitch Ratings and Standard & Poors have also flagged serious concerns:
Fitch Ratings lowered its outlook on China’s AA- long-term, local-currency rating to negative from stable on April 12 because of the risk the government would have to bail out banks. As much as 30 percent of loans to local government entities may go bad, accounting for the biggest source of banks’ non- performing assets, Standard & Poor’s said that month.
Now, are you one of those who doubts that China’s “boom” is/was driven by massive borrowing by local (regional) Chinese banks to finance over-investment in “infrastructure” – the mother of all real estate bubbles world wide?
Then take a look at these pictures from Time magazine, showing just how massive speculative over-investment in property construction has left China with literal ‘ghost cities’:
If like many readers you have skimmed over this article and not bothered to click on … and carefully read … all of the links embedded in this article, then you are doing yourself and your loved ones a disservice.
Because you are about to leave this site … ignorant.
With only part of the story.
Do not be a Goose.
Like Swan.
Educate yourself.
Lots of labour has gone into collating all these news articles from around the world.
Over many, many months.
Do yourself a favour, and become better educated about reality than the buffoon who lives in Wayne’s World.
So that you too can see with crystal clarity the gaggle of Black Swans that are soon to blot out our Aussie sun.
Then you too can help to warn others.
Because rest assured – just as with the GFC – you will get no forewarnings from our “expert” economists when the SHTF.
Or from our “authorities”.
Or from their sycophants in the mainstream “business” media.
Your superannuation depends on your being properly informed.
Because both “sides” of politics are planning to steal it … when the SHTF
Say, that photo looks a lot like Zetland in Sydney & even my old town, Wollongong.
Off topic but you might find this article interesting;
http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/Macquarie-IFC-agree-forest-carbon-investment-fund-JJDSW?OpenDocument&src=hp16
Thx JMD, that is interesting.
I find it truly touching how the investment banks of the world care so deeply about saving the planet. No really, I mean it!!
Sure as night follows day!! I’d suggest an SMSF, turn it mostly into PMs and go midnight gardening somewhere private and secure. Then let ’em try and come and get it!!