Infographic: Visualising The Size Of Australia’s Carbon Derivatives Time Bomb

24 Apr

On July 1, 2012, the government’s Clean Energy Future scheme will officially begin.

You know it as the carbon “tax”. It has been called a “tax” over and over and over again, by politicians, economists, bankers, and other vested interests, for a simple reason.

There are many who want you to think that the scheme to “put a price on carbon” is safe; that the government’s implementation of a “carbon price” is careful, methodical, and prudent.  A “fixed price” on carbon dioxide for 3 years. And only after 3 years, a transition from a fixed price to a “floating price” emissions trading scheme.

But there is something very important that they are not telling you.

There is a Ticking Time Bomb Hidden In The Carbon Tax.

It is called “derivatives”.

Carefully buried in 1,000+ pages of legislation, just 2 tiny, opaque clauses (109A and 110) have been included that allow the banks to immediately begin creating and trading unlimited quantities of unmonitored, unregulated carbon “securities” (another term for “derivatives”).

What are “derivatives”?

SHORT STORY: Pick something of value, make bets on the future value of “something”, add contract & you have a derivative. Banks make massive profits on derivatives, and when the bubble bursts chances are the tax payer will end up with the bill. This [graphic below] visualizes the total coverage for derivatives (notional). Similar to insurance company’s total coverage for all cars.

LONG STORY: A derivative is a legal bet (contract) that derives its value from another asset, such as the future or current value of oil, government bonds or anything else. [Example] A derivative buys you the option (but not obligation) to buy oil in 6 months for today’s price/any agreed price, hoping that oil will cost more in future. (I’ll bet you it’ll cost more in 6 months). Derivative can also be used as insurance, betting that a loan will or won’t default before a given date. So its a big betting system, like a Casino, but instead of betting on cards and roulette, you bet on future values and performance of practically anything that holds value. The system is not regulated what-so-ever, and you can buy a derivative on an existing derivative.

Most large banks try to prevent smaller investors from gaining access to the derivative market on the basis of there being too much risk. Deriv. market has blown a galactic bubble, just like the real estate bubble or stock market bubble (that’s going on right now). Since there is literally no economist in the world that knows exactly how the derivative money flows or how the system works, while derivatives are traded in microseconds by computers, we really don’t know what will trigger the crash, or when it will happen, but considering the global financial crisis this system is in for tough times, that will be catastrophic for the world financial system…

Australia’s banks already trade in derivatives. Most of their derivatives bets are on movements in Interest Rates and Foreign Exchange Rates. And they have a total exposure to just these forms of derivatives, that is truly mind-boggling.

The numbers are so big, that no one can comprehend them.

You have to see it for yourself.

First, via the superb demonocracy.info website, here is an infographic to help you visualise what $1 Trillion looks like (click image to enlarge):

Click to enlarge | Graphic source: demonocracy.info

Got that?

$1 Trillion is a lot of money*.

The value of all Australians’ superannuation savings combined, is about $1.3 Trillion. As is the claimed annual “GDP” of the Australian economy.

Now, here is an infographic showing the Australian banks’ recent record high total “Off-Balance Sheet” derivatives exposure.  Remember, this is before the official start of a “price on carbon” allows the banks to start creating and trading carbon derivatives too (click image to enlarge):

Click to enlarge | Graphic source: demonocracy.info | Data source: RBA statistics

I want to emphasise the point made earlier.

Almost everyone incorrectly believes that no trading will happen until 2015. But the truth is, the banks can begin creating and trading in carbon derivatives from Day 1. Even though the scheme is supposed to be a “fixed price” scheme for the 3 years up to 2015.

Those 2 little clauses I mentioned earlier (109A and 110), are the reason why trading will begin from Day 1. Trading in carbon derivatives, that is.

They are opaque, easy-to-overlook clauses stating that the Clean Energy Future legislation does not prevent the creation of and trade in carbon “securities”.

The designers of the legislation (no, not the politicians), know full well that the banking industry can and does create and trade derivatives on everything.

Including the date of your death. That’s right. We have previously documented how banks are trading in Death Derivatives.

All that is needed, is for there to be a “price” put on some thing, effectively making that thing a “commodity”.

Once there is an underlying price, then banks can create a derivative.

Provided there is no law specifically preventing them from doing so.

It is that simple.

And that is why the Clean Energy Future scheme has those two little clauses buried inside. As Explanatory Memorandum 3.36 confirms, they are “included for the avoidance of doubt” that the government does NOT wish to prevent the banks creating carbon derivatives.

That is also why, just 3 days after the government released its draft legislation for “putting a price on carbon”, it was reported that:

Australian banks are eyeing opportunities to cash in on the proposed carbon tax by developing new financial products and services that capitalise on a market seen to be worth billions of dollars annually, according to a report by the Australian Financial Review.

Australian financial firms that have experience in European carbon markets, such as Macquarie Group Ltd, Westpac Banking Corp Ltd and ANZ Banking Group Ltd are particularly keen to establish their presence in the Australian market….

ANZ’s head of energy trading said the value of the derivatives carbon market would dwarf the $10 billion initially raised by the government, according to the AFR.

You have now seen just how mind-bogglingly enormous is our banks’ exposure to (mostly) Interest Rate and Foreign Exchange Rate derivatives.

$17.93 Trillion is equivalent to nine (9) skyscrapers made of pallets of $100 bills, each towering more than twice the height of the Sydney Harbour Bridge.

The $10 billion that the government will raise from forcing companies to buy carbon permits – the basic mechanism for “putting a price on carbon” – is almost nothing compared to the value of derivatives that banks will create and trade.

Unmonitored.

Unregulated.

Off-Balance Sheet.

The government’s claimed $10 billion in expected revenue from the Clean Energy Future scheme, is equivalent to just one (1) of the 10 x 10 squares of pallets forming the base of one (1) of those derivatives skyscrapers pictured above.

That’s one (1) storey in two hundred (200).

I hope that you now have a better idea – a clear picture in your mind’s eye – of what the ANZ Bank’s head of energy trading meant, when he gleefully said that the value of the carbon derivatives market would dwarf the $10 billion initially raised by the government.

A government that has followed the lemming-like lead of Ireland, by explicitly and implicitly putting taxpayers on the hook for the deeds (and misdeeds) of the banks, by placing the nation as guarantor for the solvency of the Australian banking system.

Meaning, just like the rest of the West, our banks are Too Big To Fail.

And from July 1, thanks to the Clean Energy Future scheme and those two little clauses, the government has handed the banks a licence to print.

It is really a licence to kill.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

Tick.

* If you wonder how it is possible that banks can have so much money just in derivatives bets, you might like to learn the truth. The “money” does not really exist. Almost all of the “money” in the world, is just electronic code in computers. And banks truly rule the world, by creating “money” (digits in computers) out of thin air, and lending it to you, at interest. Even the biggest central bank in the world, the Federal Reserve Bank, has admitted that this is how banking works. Learn more here.

Advertisements

9 Responses to “Infographic: Visualising The Size Of Australia’s Carbon Derivatives Time Bomb”

  1. Richo April 24, 2012 at 2:21 pm #

    Perhaps you should send this to Wilkie and get him to advocate for mandatory pre-committment for banks on derivatives.

  2. Betty Whiffin April 24, 2012 at 3:15 pm #

    This “time bomb” will hit the world. It is all about greed. Can’t peope see it? Stop this govt now before Australia (& the world) is in its death throes. It’s heading that way now and all this has NOTHING to do with the fraudulent climate change policies. Australia will regret it unless they stand up NOW. Julia Gillard gaining the agreement of Singapore to back Australia on the search for a place on the UN Secuirty Council. More waste. Go, go, go, UN, World Government, IMF, BIS, Central Bank and Banks in general, and all the greed that goes with them.

    • Twodogs April 25, 2012 at 1:16 am #

      Singapore? Is that to add moral weight? /sarc

  3. JMD April 24, 2012 at 4:59 pm #

    Remember though, as Bill Hodgson would say “these 17.93 trillion aren’t assets in the real sense”, even though banks are booking the income, as profit, from these assets which aren’t in the real sense……

  4. Tomorrows Serf April 25, 2012 at 8:22 am #

    Substitute the word “America” for “Australia” and I think you have it in a nutshell…

    And our brave soldiers fought and died for this???

    Lest We Forget.

  5. Jazza April 25, 2012 at 11:39 am #

    I am sick to death of trying to publicize the fact the Liberals are chickening out on challenging this awful tax legislation WHY?

    A friend says Tony Abbott will just wind back a little bit of the tax to ” keep his word” but that the carbon tax will be here to stay.

    Brian Pape’s close look t the legislation led him to advise the IPA at least 5 sections of the constitution show it could be challenged.

    At least, a challenge by conservative Premiers in concert could delay it so it won’t ever be implemented prior to the next election?

    Yet they will not respond to emails or answer why not do it?

    A pox on the lot of them I say for NOT taking it up to the worst government we could imagine in our wildest dreams, dudding this country and our citizens daily! Grrr!

    • The Blissful Ignoramus April 25, 2012 at 12:27 pm #

      The bankstering sector owns the pollies on all “sides”, Jazza. That’s my take on things. Hence why I’ve long suspected/predicted that most if not all of the pollies trying to “appear” as though they oppose and will “fight” it … are simply full of it.

  6. Kevin Moore May 19, 2012 at 7:42 am #

    We are controlled by numbers and paper –

    http://www.devvy.com/notax.html

    Current Congressionally created debt:

    01/23/2012
    12/31/2011
    06/30/2011
    12/31/2010
    06/30/2010
    12/31/2009
    08/30/2009
    04/16/2009
    10/30/2008
    11/01/2007
    09/29/2006
    09/30/2005
    09/30/2004
    09/30/2003
    09/30/2002
    09/28/2001
    08/08/2001
    04/30/2001
    02/28/2001
    01/31/2001
    12/29/2000
    09/29/2000
    09/30/1999
    09/30/1998
    09/30/1997
    09/30/1996
    09/29/1995
    09/30/1994
    09/30/1993
    09/30/1992
    09/30/1991
    09/28/1990
    09/29/1989
    09/30/1988
    09/30/1987 $15,236,245,309,869.69 (D)
    $15,222,940,045,451.09 (D)
    $14,343,087,640,008.40 (D)
    $14,025,215,218,708.52 (D)
    $13,203,473,753,968.10 (D)
    $12,311,349,677,512.03 (D)
    $11,909,829,003,511.75 (D)
    $11,183,899,252,728.00 (D)
    $10,530,893,033,778.21 (R)
    $9,080,228,573,291.65 (R)
    $8,506,973,899,215.23 (R)
    $7,932,709,661,723.50 (R)
    $7,379,052,696,330.32 (R)
    $6,783,231,062,743.62 (R)
    $6,228,235,965,597.16 (R)
    $5,807,463,412,200.06 (R)
    $5,720,324,946,092.23 (R)
    $5,661,347,798,002.65 (R)
    $5,735,859,380,573.98 (R)
    $5,716,070,587,057.36 (R)
    $5,662,216,013,697.37 (D)
    $5,674,178,209,886.86 (D)
    $5,656,270,901,615.43 (D)
    $5,526,193,008,897.62 (D)
    $5,413,146,011,397.34 (D)
    $5,224,810,939,135.73 (D)
    $4,973,982,900,709.39 (D)
    $4,692,749,910,013.32 (D)
    $4,411,488,883,139.38 (D)
    $4,064,620,655,521.66 (R)
    $3,665,303,351,697.03 (R)
    $3,233,313,451,777.25 (R)
    $2,857,430,960,187.32 (R)
    $2,602,337,712,041.16 (R)
    $2,350,276,890,953.00 (R)

    The statistics above were obtained from the Bureau of The Public Debt’s web site:
    http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/NPGateway

  7. Phi Asset Managers July 17, 2012 at 5:49 am #

    Reblogged this on Phi Asset Managers.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: