v Pravde net izvestiy, v Izvestiyakh net pravdy

5 Jun

Oh how I share these sentiments!

From Gary Gibson, editor of The Dollar Vigilante:

I feel like those who stayed in the Soviet Union right up until 1991… except that most Soviets actually knew their system was terrible. They had two governmental “news” outlets, the main Communist newspaper and the main Soviet newspaper, Pravda and Izvestia. Those names meant “the truth” and “the news” respectively… and a popular Russian saying was “v Pravde net izvestiy, v Izvestiyakh net pravdy” (In the Truth there is no news, and in the News there is no truth).

Here the local slaves still think the propaganda and drivel on CNN and other mainstream programming is actually both the truth and real news!

It’s a good thing I am still sitting in a bar and can drink the only government-approved intoxicating agent…even if it is the least effective and slowest of the various ways to make the world melt away. No wonder everyone here drinks so much!

It’s really looking like the final chapter of Atlas Shrugged with everyone clinging to centrally planned solutions even as those solutions accelerate economic collapse.

Advertisements

8 Responses to “v Pravde net izvestiy, v Izvestiyakh net pravdy”

  1. Kevin Moore June 5, 2013 at 3:03 pm #

    http://www.radioislam.org/historia/mkampf/bul/index.htm

    Excerpts from Adolph Hitlers’ book “Mein Kampf” pages 138 and 139

    “……….If we consider the attitude of various Governments towards a whole series of really pernicious phenomena in public life, we shall at once recognise the fearful significance of this policy of half-measures and the lack of courage to take responsibilities. I shall single out only a few from the large numbers of instances known to me.

    In journalistic circles it is a pleasing custom to speak of the Press as a ‘Great Power’ within the State. As a matter of fact its importance is immense. One cannot easily overestimate it, for the Press continues the work of education even in adult life. Generally, readers of the press can be classified into three groups:

    First, those who believe everything they read;

    Second, those who no longer believe anything;

    Third, those who critically examine what they read and form from their judgements accordingly.

    Numerically, the first group is by far the strongest, being composed of the broad masses of the people………………….

    ………………………………………………The third group is easily the smallest, being composed of real intellectuals whom natural aptitude and education have taught to think for themselves and who in all things try to form their own judgements, while at the same time carefully sifting what they read. They will not read any newspaper without using their own intelligence to collaborate with that of the writer and naturally this does not set the writer an easy task. journalists appreciate this type of reader only with a certain amount of reservation.

    Hence the trash that newspapers are capable of serving up is of little danger —— much less of importance——-to the third group of readers. In the majority of cases these readers have learnt to regard every journalist as fundamentally a rogue who sometimes speaks the truth. Most unfortunately the value of these readers lies in their intelligence and not in their numerical strength, an unhappy state of affairs in a period where wisdom counts for nothing and majorities for everything. Nowadays when the voting papers of the masses are the deciding factor; the decision lies in the hands of the numerically strongest group; that is to say the first group, the crowd of simpletons and the credulous…………………………

    ………………………………Particular attention should be paid to the Press; for its influence on these people is by far the strongest and most penetrating of all; since its affect is not transitory but continual. Its immense significance lies in the uniform and persistent repetition of its teaching. Here if anywhere, the State should never forget that all means should converge to the same end. It must not be led astray by the will-o’-the-wisp of so called ‘freedom of the Press’, or is talked into neglecting its duty, and withholding from the nation that which is good and does good. With ruthless determination the State must keep control of this instrument of popular education and place it at the service of the State and the nation………………………….

    ………………………..Was it not the German Press that understood how to make all the nonsensical talk obout ‘Western democracy’ palatable to our people, until an exuberant public was eventually prepared to entrust its future to the League of Nations? Was not this Press instrumental in bringing a state of moral degredation among our people? Were not morals and public decency made to look ridiculous and classed out of date and banal,until finally our people also became modernised?……………………………..

    …………………………………The function of the so called liberal Press was to dig the grave for the German people and Reich. No mention need be made of the lying Marxist Press. To them the spreading of falsehood is as much a vital necessity as the mouse is to a cat. Their task is to break the national backbone of the people, thus preparing the nation to become the slaves of international finance and its masters, the Jews……………………

    …………………………………….And what measures did the State take to counteract this wholesale poisoning of the public mind? None, absolutely nothing at all. By this policy it was hoped to win the favour of this pest—–by means of flattery, by a recognition of the ‘value’ of the Press, its importance, its ‘educative mission’ and similar nonsense. The Jews acknowledged all this with a knowing smile and returned thanks.”

    From page 132, “……….Of course it would be out of the question to enter into an arguement with these liars who deny at one moment what they said the moment before. I should waste no further words on them were it not for the fact that there are many thoughtless people who repeat all this in parrot fashion, without necessarily being inspired by any evil motives. But the observations I am making here are also meant for our fighting followers, seeing that nowadays ones spoken words are often forgotten and twisted in their meaning..”

  2. Kevin Moore June 8, 2013 at 8:33 am #

    http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/06/high-level-american-intelligence-source-we-hack-everyone-everywhere-we-like-to-make-a-distinction-between-us-and-the-others-but-we-are-in-almost-every-country-in-the-world.html

    Why did the media let this information out?

    I suspect that the spy agencies are suffering from information overload and are trying to panic people into self censoring, thus leaving the real resistors of Big Brother on the priority purge list.

    Let all things be done to the honour of God [John 20:28]
     
    Ezekiel Ch.33:………….”But the watchman, if he sees the sword coming, and does not blow the trumpet, and the people are not warned, and the sword comes and takes from them a soul, he is taken in his iniquity. But I will require his blood from the watchman’s hand.”…………

    Protocol 5. “…….There is nothing more dangerous than personal initiative; …………………………………… such initiative can do more harm than can be done by millions of people among whom we have sown discord. We must so direct the education of the goyim communities that whenever they come upon a matter requiring initiative they may drop their hands in despairing impotence……”

    Luke 12:4 “But I say to you, the friends of Me, Stop being afraid of those killing the body, and after these things not having anything more to do.”

    Galatians 6:7 “Be not led astray, God is not mocked; for what ever a man may sow, this also will he reap; because he sowing to the flesh of himself, of the flesh will reap corruption; but he sowing to the Spirit, of the Spirit will reap life everlasting.” Revelation 14:14-17

  3. Kevin Moore June 8, 2013 at 2:41 pm #

    AND THE MEDIA LIES BY OMISSION — WHERE HAVE YOU HEARD THIS BEING REPORTED?
    US GOVERNMENTS BAN THE FEEDING OF HOMELESS PEOPLE —

    IN WHICH GOD DOES THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT TRUST?

    “In Houston, Texas, a group of Christians was banned from dispensing food to the homeless. They were told they would not be granted a permit to do so in the future even if they applied for one.
    Bobby and Amanda Herring spent more than a year providing food to homeless people in downtown Houston every day. They fed them, left behind no trash and doled out warm meals peacefully without a single crime being committed, Bobby Herring said.
    That ended two weeks ago when the city shut down their “Feed a Friend” effort for lack of a permit. And city officials say the couple most likely will not be able to obtain one. “We don’t really know what they want, we just think that they don’t want us down there feeding people,” said Bobby Herring, a Christian rapper who goes by the stage name Tre9.
    Dallas, Texas has adopted a law that restricts the ability of individuals and ministries to feed the homeless.
    A Dallas-area ministry is suing the city over a food ordinance that restricts the group from giving meals to the homeless.
    Courts dismissed Dallas’ request for a summary judgment last week, saying the case, brought up by pastor Don Hart (in video above) may indeed be a violation of free exercise of religion, as protected by the Texas Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the blog Religion Clause reported. In the court filing, the ministry leaders argue that their Christian faith requires them to share meals with the homeless (Jesus did!) and that the requirement that even churches and charities provide toilets, sinks, trained staff and consent of the city keeps them from doing so.
    Las Vegas, Nevada became the first major U.S. city to pass laws banning the feeding of homeless people. That law has been blocked by a federal judge. Learning from this experience, many U.S. cities have been very careful not to mention “the indigent” or “the homeless” in the laws they pass banning the feeding the homeless.
    Las Vegas, whose homeless population has doubled in the past decade to about 12,000 people in and around the city, joins several other cities across the country that have adopted or considered ordinances limiting the distribution of charitable meals in parks. Most have restricted the time and place of such handouts, hoping to discourage homeless people from congregating and, in the view of officials, ruining efforts to beautify downtowns and neighborhoods. But the Las Vegas ordinance is believed to be the first to explicitly make it an offense to feed “the indigent.”
    New York City banned all food donations to government-run homeless shelters because lawmakers claim the donations are not nutritious enough.
    The Bloomberg administration is now taking the term “food police” to new depths, blocking food donations to all government-run facilities that serve the city’s homeless. In conjunction with a mayoral task force and the Health Department, the Department of Homeless Services recently started enforcing new nutritional rules for food served at city shelters. Since DHS can’t assess the nutritional content of donated food, shelters have to turn away good Samaritans.
    Elected representatives continue to pass regulations and laws with no end in sight.
    Sadly, this power grabbing by our state governments may be masking a bigger plan. All over the country, the Department of Homeland Security has been building FEMA Camps designed to house millions of displaced Americans. DHS claims these facilities were constructed to assist the government in the event of an economic disaster. Considering the foreclosure crisis and unemployment problem in the US is creating a larger homeless population, would soon be the time to activate these FEMA Camps for use?
    Appears that the states are becoming increasingly hostile toward the homeless. How long would it take before the US government offers a stay at the FEMA Camps to alleviate the “problem” for the individual states?”
    http://www.occupycorporatism.com/states-banning-homeless-masks-a-bigger-plan/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+OccupyCorporatism+%28OCCUPY+CORPORATISM%29

  4. Kevin Moore June 9, 2013 at 9:27 am #

    OBLIGATION BY LAW TO LIE

    http://www.naturalnews.com/040692_NSA_spying_tech_companies_FISA.html
    Tech companies rush to issue (false) denials
    “………Immediately after these revelations surfaced over the past few days, all these companies began denying any involvement with the NSA. “Google CEO Larry Page and Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg are denying reports that depict two of the Internet’s most influential companies as willing participants in a secret government program that gives the National Security Agency unfettered access to email and other personal information transmitted on various online services,” reports the San Francisco branch of CBS News.

    But what nobody is yet revealing is that all these companies are required by law to LIE to their own customers about secret government surveillance.

    The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, you see, makes it a federal crime for any company participating in the surveillance to publicly acknowledge the existence of that surveillance. Thus, executives at Facebook, Google, Skype and others would all face arrest and federal prosecution as “terrorists” if they admitted the truth to their own users.

    That’s just how far down the rabbit hole this government surveillance program goes: Not only does the government spy on you and everything you do — “they quite literally can watch your ideas as you type” — the government can also force all the tech companies cooperating with the spying to publicly deny the existence of the program.

    But the New York Times — yes, the NYT which hardly ever engages is actual journalism — has gone public with an article confirming that these tech companies did, indeed, concede to the NSA surveillance program. “They opened discussions with national security officials about developing technical methods to more efficiently and securely share the personal data of foreign users in response to lawful government requests. And in some cases, they changed their computer systems to do so,” says the NYT in an article titled Tech Companies Concede to Surveillance Program………….”.

  5. Kevin Moore June 11, 2013 at 7:44 pm #

    http://kangaroocourtofaustralia.com/2013/06/11/australian-senate-told-government-agencies-have-been-blocking-websites-since-at-least-2004/

    RT-news has access blocked when I click onto articles dealing with Julian Assange or the NSA whistleblower.

  6. Kevin Moore June 13, 2013 at 9:22 am #

    Israeli Big Brother is Watching You!

    Israel (and Probably the Mossad in Particular) Is Responsible for Spying on Millions of Americans

    “BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU, the caption said, while the dark eyes looked deep into Winston’s own….It was the police patrol, snooping into people’s windows. The patrols did not matter, however. Only the Thought Police mattered.”—George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four

    …by Jonas E. Alexis

    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/06/11/israeli-big-brother-is-watching-you/

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: