WARNING: Do not watch if bad language offends.
Tags: bankers, capital punishment, death penalty, george carlin, usury
“The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank…sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.”Quote by: Carroll Quigley (1910-1977) Professor of History at Georgetown University, member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), mentor to Bill Clinton Source: in his book Tragedy and Hope, 1966, pg 324
Thanks for this Kevin – I’d read it several times previously, and forgotten about it.
Iraq and Libya have been taken out, and Iran has been heavily boycotted. Syria is now in the cross-hairs. Why? Here is one overlooked scenario.
In an August 2013 article titled “Larry Summers and the Secret ‘End-game’ Memo,” Greg Palast posted evidence of a secret late-1990s plan devised by Wall Street and U.S. Treasury officials to open banking to the lucrative derivatives business. To pull this off required the relaxation of banking regulations not just in the US but globally. The vehicle to be used was the Financial Services Agreement of the World Trade Organization.
The “end-game” would require not just coercing support among WTO members but taking down those countries refusing to join. Some key countries remained holdouts from the WTO, including Iraq, Libya, Iran and Syria. In these Islamic countries, banks are largely state-owned; and “usury” – charging rent for the “use” of money – is viewed as a sin, if not a crime. That puts them at odds with the Western model of rent extraction by private middlemen. Publicly-owned banks are also a threat to the mushrooming derivatives business, since governments with their own banks don’t need interest rate swaps, credit default swaps, or investment-grade ratings by private rating agencies in order to finance their operations…………..”
Kevin, do you seriously think that Larry Summers could pull off an ‘end game’? Have you seen him?
A simpler explanation; the 2000’s was in fact ‘boom’ times for Middle Eastern Nations. ‘Boom’ in the same sense as here or the US, in another word, INFLATION.
There may have been a relaxation of banking rules, but blaming some secret zionist-Wall St cabal is not necessary. These middle eastern countries, through stupidity, their own avarice, or both, relaxed the rules themselves as the quick road to riches. The credit systems of these nations were inflated for the illusion of wealth it creates. Bank vaults were stuffed full of all kinds of worthless IOU’s. Then came the credit bust, you might remember Dubai a few years ago.
Where the ‘conspiracy’ comes in is that certain governments have attempted, and in the case of Libya – succeeded, in ‘leveraging’ (through economic sanctions, propaganda & gunrunning) the discontent of the populace at the crumbled illusion of wealth, to create a state of complete chaos & ‘regime change’. Threats of missile strikes are the latest form of ‘leverage’.
Dubai, Egypt & Turkey haven’t been targeted because they are tight with the Pentagon, but all are suffering. No foreign government is applying economic sanctions to us, or smuggling high powered weapons into the country, but I assure you things would be far more dangerous here if they were.
Rothschild national banks are behind the attacks on Syria.
“…………At present Syria has no debt from the IMF. It only has loans from friends such as Russia. It is therefore becoming a target for American and NATO aggression.
Let nobody make the mistake of thinking that national bank independence does not matter. If a country is free from foreign financial control, it can have an independent foreign policy.
And that is the second big reason, identified by Syrian Girl, as to why the New World Order is determined to attack Syria. In Palestine, Iraq and Libya, Syrian foreign policy has been anti-Zionist, anti-globalist and anti-New World Order. Syria is one of the few countries which do not recognise the self-pitying, aggressive, apartheid entity of Zionist Israel. Syria can have this foreign policy because it has an independent central bank.
So Rothschild control is what the New World Order intends for Syria……………”
Read more at
Rothchilds were behind the American Civil War backing each side, until they got constrained. Behind the lst World War when they financed all sides, but then the Americans, so long as Balfour gave them some assurance for a Zionist controlled Palestine, that was rescinded later. I am not sure about the second world war, but they would have been financially backing the allies, not the anti Jewish axis. So I wouldn’t contradict the above.
No debt from the IMF but plenty of bad debt of its own making.
Sanctions prevent payments between Syrian & foreign banks, thus the Syrian Pound rapidly loses value against other currencies, turning a credit crunch into a economic crisis as ‘money’ i.e. credit, vanishes, hence the illusion. Disgruntled citizens easily lead to civil disobedience, add guns & you have insurrection. Iran is currently also being squeezed.
To say Larry Summers or the Rothschilds planned the whole thing is beyond credibility. That’s not to say the likes of Larry Summers & the Rothschilds don’t ‘leverage’ the situation to their advantage.
As a thought experiment, consider what might have happened here in 2008 if the Australian government wasn’t so ‘tight’ with the Pentagon.
What would have happened if the RBA hadn’t got it’s 40 odd billion USD loan from the Fed? The AUD might have fallen to 10 US cents or lower. People would have been watching there life savings vanish in a matter of weeks. Do you think they would have been happy?
What if certain foreign governments had exacerbated the situation through financial sanctions, stopping interbank payments? No payments no trade, no trade no jobs…..
Over 900 documentaries here, including the topic of banking –
This clip would still amuse without the ethno-masochism.
Comments are closed.