Ok, fine. Maybe it’s just me.
But I find this positively hilarious.
Here is Climate Change Minister Greg Combet’s oh-so-obviously fallacious attempt at sledging Barnaby’s economic nous on June 2, 2011 (or, see it here on the ALP’s own website):
“Barnaby blunders as economicsts (sic) back carbon price”
Ok, ok, maybe I’m just a spelling nazi. I still think it’s hilarious … and somewhat of a Freudian slip.
Notice too, that the apparently illiterate Combet loudly and proudly bangs on about “13 of Australia’s most prominent economists” who had written an Open Letter in support of a carbon (dioxide) price.
Funny how he neglected to mention that at least 7 of those 13 “economicsts” (sic) are employed by banks. And, that at least another 3 were previously employed by banks.
Yes, that’s right. At least 77% of those Open Letter “economicsts” (sic) were and/or still are employed by the very same parasites who are pressing the hardest for carbon dioxide “pricing” as the basis for their new global casino.
Do you think that little nugget of truth might just have some influence on their “support” for it?
Oh yes. One other thing.
Did you know that one of those “13 most prominent” “economicsts” – Mr Saul Eslake – had himself a little dummy spit right here on this lowly blog, because he didn’t like his little group of rent-seeking parasites being referred to as “The Banksters’ Glee Club”?
Yes indeed. Mr Eslake threw his rattle right out of the cot. See for yourself.
And a good thing it is too.
Because thanks to his little tantrums – yes, more than one – we have now seen a further glimpse of both the heights of vanity, and the depths of deception, that these “economicsts”, banksters, and their dyslexic political lackeys like Combet et al will go to, in order to get the legislation needed to implement their megalithic new derivatives trading casino scam passed through our Parliament.
Behold … “By Saul’s Own Words They Stand Condemned”.
Seriously – would you trust an ocean-front dwelling former union hack who can’t even spell the word “economist” to successfully implement a multi-billion dollar, economy-altering energy taxation scheme?
Barnaby Is Right 
Comments