Tag Archives: Michael West

Our Banks Sell 30-Year Mortgages To 100 Year-Olds

1 Jun


Australia’s own sub-prime mortgage bubble has a face … and it’s very wrinkly.

From the always superb Michael West, of BusinessDay:

Why you’re never too old for the banks

Heather Simmers turned 102 years of age this week. When she was 98, Westpac signed her up for a 30-year mortgage. Lending that personal touch, the bank manager even made the sojourn to the Clem Jones Nursing Home in Bulimba to sign up Heather for the ”Rocket” investment loan.

It may seem an act of supreme optimism by Westpac to be providing a $440,000 loan facility to a customer who would soon receive her letter from Her Majesty. Yet it is not beyond the realms of possibility that Ms Simmers may have met her obligations.

The greatest authenticated age to which any human has ever lived is French woman Jeanne Louise Calment, who was born on February 21, 1875, and died at a nursing home in Arles in the south of France on August 4, 1997.

Had Jean Louise signed up for Westpac’s Rocket package at the age of 98, she could plausibly have met her obligations by the time she passed at the age of 122 years and 164 days – assuming she made early repayments. It is an attractive option of the Rocket facility that extra repayments can be made at any time without charge.

Incidentally, nine of the 10 oldest people in the world ever are women. But the man is still alive. He is Jiroemon Kimura, who lives in Japan and is 116 years and 43 days old.

Born on April 19, 1897, the supercentarian has survived the rule of no less than 61 Japanese prime ministers. And, as it happens, he is also a client of Westpac, having signed up for a Rocket facility (available with a special 100 per cent offset transaction account for a limited time only, conditions apply).

OK, just kidding, sorry. Mr Kimura is not a client of Westpac, as far as we are aware. He may be. As long as he could sign a piece of paper, he would certainly be eligible.

To be fair to Westpac, though, it is by no means alone in attending to the centarian market. If you are a mature reader of this column, and you are concerned that a Westpac bank manager is about to stride past your nursing station at any moment, toting a clipboard, a pen and a loan application form, fear not!

He could be from ANZ. When challenged during a legal dispute as to its practice of signing up an octogenarian – these are mere ankle-biters by Westpac standards – ANZ declared: ”We don’t discriminate against our customers on the basis of age.”

Dignity hath no bounds.

It would be remiss to omit the celebrated case of Storm Financial too, where the Commonwealth Bank was stitching up pensioners with margin loans.

When it comes to usury, as long as there is a potentially deceased estate as security for the loan, a customer’s age is no barrier. Though longevity is a nuisance for the banks when the ”buffer money” runs dry. This buffer is the extra loan that is structured into the package, for those with little or no income, to meet the interest payments on the main loan. Many of these are coming up for a refinance now.

THANK YOU Michael, for using the correct term!

Perhaps, like the insurance companies who fret about population age, the banks could consider ”longevity swaps” to hedge their rising exposure to the more, er, life-experienced demographic.

Europe’s biggest defence company, BAE Systems, recently struck the largest ever pensions insurance transaction, a £3.2 billion longevity swap to cover 31,000 pensioners. Insurers Legal & General and reinsurers Hannover Re agreed to take on 30 per cent and 70 per cent of the risk respectively.

There is also a risk for the banks that somebody might invent a longer life pill.

Returning to the case of Heather Simmers, Westpac recently and quietly forgave the loans to both Simmers and her 70-year-old daughter, Del Black. They had been inveigled into borrowing to invest in a dodgy Gold Coast property play touting 15 per cent returns. That quickly blew up.

Westpac executive Jim Tate told the Senate banking inquiry last year: ”It was an outright fraud. There is no question about that. Obviously the bank will be disgusted about it, and we would want to take action against the person involved, if it has not already been taken.”

Senator John Williams pointed out that Westpac had even provided oral references for Heather Simmers’ banker, David St Pierre, who had left the bank to work for another mortgage broker. Zero action taken, apart from the provision of job references.

As in the US, it is hard to think of a single action against a banker, by regulators or by the banks themselves, although the abuses of the credit boom are prolific. Bankers are clearly off limits, a protected species.

On Monday, we will reveal the results of an investigation into low doc lending in Australia, along with emails between banks and brokers – and claims of widespread forging of loan documents.

The banks and regulators have their stories ready. They question the credibility of those making the claims and blame any irregularities on ”rogue” mortgage brokers. The victims say the banks are the puppet-masters in a widespread systemic rort and the brokers are merely their agents.

“question the credibility of those making the claims” = The deceitful logic of the ad hominem fallacy.

“blame any irregularities on ‘rogue’ mortgage brokers” – The deceitful logic of the “red herring” fallacy.

Banks. The unnecessary scourge of Planet Earth.

Let us be rid of them.

RBA & Treasury Coverup – Data Culled At Behest Of Banks

6 Dec

Being the first Tuesday of the month, there’ll be lots of attention on the Reserve Bank today, with many hoping for another cut in the official interest rate in time for Christmas.

So I thought that today, we might take a closer look at the RBA too.

Remember that critical joined-at-the-hip relationship between our Big Four banks, and the government’s balance sheet, that your humble blogger has been banging on about lately?

The relationship that means our government must get its budget back in shape, else its guarantees that are the only thing propping up our zombie banks will lose credibility with the ratings agencies?

Michael West at The Age has been looking at those government guarantees too. His investigation has dug a little deeper into the dark heart of our government-banker kleptocracy (my emphasis added):

Public information turns confidential – RBA culls data

The Reserve Bank of Australia and federal Treasury have been systematically purging public information from their databases at the request of the big banks.

During the course of an investigation into the wholesale funding guarantee, BusinessDay found large swathes of information relating to the use of the guarantee had been expunged from the http://www.guaranteescheme.gov.au website.

This culling of public data follows revelations here last year that the corporate regulator, the Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC) had been deleting evidence of the waivers it had provided to liquidators.

Commitment to transparency?

Now the RBA and Treasury appear to have made an even greater mockery of the government’s “commitment to transparency and accountability”. The funding guarantee scheme is an unprecedented concession for the banks – they are underpinned by the taxpayer and, thanks to sovereign largesse, cannot go bust.

Nonetheless, almost all detail relating to more than $100 billion in taxpayer-guaranteed funding has vanished. Only the details of current guarantees survive.

We can only surmise that both the government and the banks are trying to pretend there was never any corporate welfare in the first place. For the banks’ part, it is harder to justify $10 million executive salaries for running a taxpayer-guaranteed institution.

And for the government’s part, the censorship can only be put down to an obsequious backpedalling on previous public commitments in order to appease the powerful banks.

Unconvincingly trying to rationalise their role in the purge, Treasury responded that public information about sovereign support for the banks had suddenly become confidential.

“Further data on liabilities issued under the Scheme by individual participating institutions is not provided on the Guarantee Scheme website for reasons of confidentiality,” a spokesman told BusinessDay.

It was the sort of line which would have made Sir Humphrey Appleby proud.

With Europe in disarray, and the impending prospect of further taxpayer support for the banks – the RBA has recently foreshadowed relaxing the rules on what assets banks can swap for RBA cash – this is hardly the time for there to be any question over the integrity of public institutions and their information.

[click the link to read the entire article, including how the RBA and Treasury tried to cover-up in response to Mr West’s investigations]

None of this should come as any surprise to regular readers of barnabyisright.com.

There are already very big questions over the “integrity” of our public institutions.

As we saw in Funding For Policy Scandal – Australia Is A Kleptocracy, our very system of government means that our political parties depend on bank loans to fund their election campaigns.


It is because the parties do not receive their multi-million dollar handouts from the public trough – a distribution which is based on % of the popular vote – until after the election, when the actual number of votes received by each party is confirmed.

So, they have to go hat-in-hand to the banks, begging for loans, in order to mount their campaigns in the first place.

If that is not a relationship of dependency that is absolutely ripe for corruption, then I don’t know what is.

There really is “An Unholy Alliance Of Politicians And Bankers Versus Ordinary People”

%d bloggers like this: