Tag Archives: debt and deficit

Is Barnaby Really An Idiot?

13 Mar

Take a look at this chart, and then think very carefully about your answer (click to enlarge) –

USA - Federal Surplus / Deficit since 1901

That chart is from the US Federal Reserve, St Louis branch.  For the last 108 years.

And it’s not bang up to date.  It only goes up to end September 2009. Hard to believe, but the US government has gone much, much deeper into the negative in the 5.5 months since then. In February alone, the US went another US$221bn into the hole. That’s a one month record.

Do you remember how the Rudd Labor and mainstream media’s assault on Barnaby Joyce’s economic credibility began?  When he publicly questioned whether the US could default on its debt.

Well… what do you reckon?  Look at that chart.  Think about it.  Use your own commonsense.

Barnaby is right.

And there are plenty of esteemed international economists … including the current chairman of the US Federal Reserve… who agree.

As does US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, who called the US deficit a ‘national security risk’ just 2 weeks ago.

France Next On Debt Watch

13 Mar

From the Globe and Mail (UK), via Reuters:

French debt looks set to come under pressure in the near future with investors battered by the Greek crisis arguing it is pricey and does not reflect France’s growing indebtedness.

As a result, other euro zone paper, including Germany’s and — perhaps surprisingly — Italy’s, could be in for a filip.

The gist is not that France’s economy is under any immediate Greece-like default stress, but the cost of its bonds — and the cost of insuring them — does not properly reflect what stress is actually there.

“France has been lumped as a core euro zone economy. To our mind the budgetary situation is not as good as the pricing suggests,” said Richard Batty, an investment director at Britain’s Standard Life Investments.

“It is being priced as though there isn’t a budget problem,” he said.

In it latest note, Mr. Batty’s firm said it was being put off French debt because its fiscal problems and the true cost to euro zone economies of any bailout of peripheral economies are not fully priced in to its debt.

This echoes the view of a number of other fund managers and bank analysts.

Less than a week ago, famous international financier George Soros warned that the Euro currency ‘may not survive’ the Greek debt crisis contagion in the Eurozone.

Others fear that the UK will be the next to fall thanks to its enormous debt levels.

Meanwhile, in Australia our financial authorities remain seemingly oblivious to the dangers from every quarter of the globe. They are still advising the government that we will simply sail out of the Rudd Government’s massive debt, on the back of a multi-decade China-fueled mining boom.

More evidence emerges almost daily, that this new China boom is no more than a hopeful fantasy, that will collapse possibly as soon as 2012.

Labor’s Debt Legacy

12 Mar

Media Release – Senator Barnaby Joyce, 12 March 2010

Senator Barnaby Joyce says that reports in The Australian today confirm what the Coalition has been saying for months on debt and interest rates. Simply put, the Rudd Government’s excessive and profligate spending is putting upward pressure on interest rates.

It is clear that the RBA have resorted to the fastest increases in interest rates among advanced economies in response to the effects of this spending. So while other countries enjoy modest rises, hard working Australians will be paying the price for Labor’s bad management.

There is still a major portion of the $42 billion Nation Building and Jobs Plan to spend and while the Government has almost $128 billion of debt on issue (almost $16,000 per household), this is less than half its projected peak of $270 billion in 2014-15.

Gross debt has risen from $126.183 billion two weeks ago to $127.982 billion today. In two weeks the debt has risen by $1.8 billion. Easy to throw these figures about, but remember, just this increase is enough to seal 9000 kilometres of 6 metre wide road in country Queensland. This would take us from Sydney to Perth and back again and still have money left over.

It is highly unlikely there will be many left of the current Labor members by the time this debt is repaid. In fact quite a few will have passed away, but the debt will still be with us.

More Information- Jenny Swan 0746 251500

The Net Debt Picture

12 Mar

Here’s a picture that speaks volumes.

From the government’s 2009-10 Mid-Year Fiscal and Economic Outlook, Appendix D, Table D4, I’ve made the following chart tracking official ‘net debt’ since 1982 (click on chart to enlarge) –

Australian Government - Net Debt

I’ve marked the first full budget year for each successive government, from Labor’s Bob Hawke through to Labor’s Kevin Rudd.

See that steep fall in government net debt on the chart?  The one that took the nation from $96.2bn in net debt, down down down to negative $44.82bn in net debt?

Yes. That was a Coalition government.

See the rocket-like launch back UP to unprecedented levels of net debt?  Yes, that’s the Rudd Government’s panicked, totally unnecessary spending binge for you. The one they’ve been lying about.

With much more debt still to come.

After all, they borrowed another $1.6bn just this week. See the AOFM website, and click on the links under ‘Recent Tender Results”.

And next week, they’re planning to borrow another $2.1bn.

The massive, multi-billion dollar cockups in every single “stimulus” spending program, will only add to their… OUR… huge and unpayable debts.

Tanner Lies About Budget, GFC

11 Mar

Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner has demonstrated yet again that he is a liar and a fraud:

Lindsay Tanner today accused the Opposition of punching a $2 billion hole in the budget after it helped defeat a means test on the private health insurance rebate last night.

“Tony Abbott and the Liberal Party are blocking almost all the government’s major initiatives in the Senate these days,” Mr Tanner told ABC radio.

“We faced a huge budget problem as a result of the global financial crisis. We have to repair the damage to the budget and we have to get the budget back into surplus as quickly as possible.”

“Yet he’s punched a huge hole in our savings initiatives that are designed to get the budget back into surplus quickly.”

In a recent column for the Sydney Morning Herald, ironically and hypocritically titled “Dishonesty in the debt debate”, Lindsay Tanner wrote:

Why are we going into debt?  Because the global financial crisis punched a huge hole in our projected revenues, and forced us to act to support the economy and to sustain jobs.  Had we just sat back and watched, as our opponents seem to suggest, we would have seen unemployment rise dramatically.  That would have reduced tax revenues even further, and thus pushed us into deficit anyway… The Rudd government had no choice but to intervene to protect Australian working people from the ravages of the crisis.  The dishonest campaign about debt being prosecuted by our opponents should be seen for the fraud it is.

Tanner’s claim that the GFC “punched a huge hole” in the government’s projected revenues, is an outright lie. And I will prove it to you, from the government’s own Budget documents.

The real reason that Rudd Labor faces a “huge budget problem” is not a result of the global financial crisis. Instead, it is entirely a result of their panicked, monumentally incompetent response to the idea of a GFC.

The simple fact is this: Contrary to Tanner’s recent claim, and Labor’s shrill proclamations throughout 2009, the GFC barely affected Australian government revenues at all. The “huge budget problem” is entirely of the Rudd Government’s own making. Because their team of uneducated economic illiterates panicked, and went on a massive, unnecessary spending binge. And now they are lying to cover up that fact.

Want proof?

Take a look at the Government’s 2009-10 Budget, Statement 10, released in May 2009.  It shows that Government income (“Receipts”) was estimated to be down by just $7.8bn (2.7%) on the previous year –

Continue reading ‘Tanner Lies About Budget, GFC’

Debt Bubble Has To Burst

10 Mar

From Business Spectator:

This week is the one-year anniversary of the historic stock market rally which has seen US shares climb by almost 70 per cent – and we’re getting set to celebrate in style…

After all, what’s to worry about? Governments across the world are continuing to run massive budget deficits and interest rates are close to zero. The markets aren’t worried about the massive explosion in government debt, because they figure it’ll just mean that governments will have to keep interest rates at historic lows while they continue to pour liquidity into the system.

But while the markets continue to party, one dark thought presents itself. What happens if someone looks outside and sees that the real US economy is still in deep trouble? It is plagued by high unemployment, continuing weakness in the housing market, and faces mounting problems in commercial real estate that threaten to further destabilise the banking system.

What happens when the penny drops that massive government spending packages, combined with unprecedented money printing by central banks, have not produced a sustainable economic recovery?

As RBS strategist Bob Janjuah points out in his latest newsletter, the “gap between the fantasy in markets…versus the reality of the real economy/private sector, is already worryingly large, but risks becoming dangerously large.”

Janjuah says that there hasn’t been any sustainable recovery in private sector demand, and there won’t be for some years to come. Furthermore, there is nothing that can be done about it. Major economies can not generate growth by devaluing their currencies and trying to export their way out of trouble, because this is a strategy that everyone is using. All the big economies are trying to devalue and every country is looking to export. The problem is that there’s no obvious candidate to buy all these exports.

Janjuah also takes aim at those who believe that the massive build-up in government debt isn’t a problem because governments can simply erode the value of the debt through higher inflation. This strategy, he says, only works when inflation is unanticipated. When the market is expecting higher inflation, it pre-emptively prices in this risk of inflation in the form of higher interest rates. And already half the market is expecting to see governments try to inflate away their debts.

The other massive delusion that is buoying markets is that governments can keep pumping/printing/borrowing for long enough to compensate for the slump in demand from the private sector as it cuts back spending and tries to pay back debt. According to Janjuah, the time limits on this strategy are drawing nigh. “Those limits are pretty much already with us (Greece), or are soon to be with us, give or take a few months (in the United Kingdom), or at best, give or take a few quarters (in the case of the United States).”

The conclusion is inevitable; the bubble must burst. And Janjuah fervently hopes that that this happens sooner, rather than later. “The longer we are forced to wait, the bigger the bubble will be and the more horribly damaging the bursting process will be. And if we are forced to wait and the bubble gets anywhere like the one that went pop in late 2007 I have zero idea who will credibly be able to bail us all out the next time round. Certainly not our governments.”

Rudd’s Interest Bill – $48.49bn to 2013

6 Mar

How much will Rudd’s spending spree cost Australian taxpayers… just in Interest-only?

$48.488 Billion to 2013. With more to come.

That’s enough to buy a No-business-plan-No-cost/benefit-analysis National Broadband Network.  With $5.5 Billion left over in loose change for, let’s say, a disastrous home insulation scheme plus the costs of fixing it afterwards.

Need proof?

I made the chart below using the data from the Government’s Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook (MYEFO) 2009-10 Budget statements. It shows the government’s projections of Interest on debt for this financial year, and the following three years. These are the Total Interest* (not principal) repayments that Kevin Rudd has incurred, and we-the-taxpayers must pay back –

Interest on debt - Total $48.488 Billion

Interest Expense - MYEFO 2009-10, Appendix B, Note 10

Note:  This is only the “Estimates” (2009-10, 2010-11) and “Projections” (2011-12, 2012-13) for Interest-on-debt, as at November 2009 when the MYEFO was published. With the Rudd Government still borrowing well over $1 billion a week, who knows just how big the Interest-only bill is now.

One thing we do know.  We cannot pay it back.

* Total Interest includes $5.49 Billion in ‘Other financing costs’ – What exactly is that, and who gets it?

Budget Oversight Office Needed For Australia

6 Mar

From Bloomberg:

Obama Budget Underestimates Deficit Over 10 Years, CBO Says

President Barack Obama’s budget proposal would generate bigger deficits than advertised each year for the next decade, with the 10-year shortfall totaling $1.2 trillion more than the administration estimated, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

The nonpartisan CBO, in an annual analysis of the White House budget proposal, said today that under Obama’s plan deficits would never shrink below 4 percent of the economy between now and 2020. The cumulative deficits would total $9.76 trillion, and debt held by the public would amount to 90 percent of the nation’s gross domestic product by 2020, the CBO said.

By 2020, the federal debt would grow to $20.3 trillion under Obama’s budget, according to CBO.

Those figures are all higher than the administration estimated last month…

On March 3rd I drew attention to how Rudd Labor has doctored the 2009-10 Budget numbers, to show both a higher GDP, and lower government spending, in the current year and in the forward projections.

It is high time that Australia had an independent, nonpartisan Budget Oversight Office, to forensically examine and then alert the public to the highly dubious accounting practices employed by the government to make itself appear far more fiscally responsible than it actually is.

Rain For Henry, Stevens’ Parade

5 Mar

From Business Spectator:

Today’s commentary is all about lessons learned and not learned in the GFC.

ABARE has rained on the commodity bulls’ parade with forecasts of falling commodity prices in the medium term, and a falling dollar from next year. This is no surprise to this column, which has argued consistently that the prices of the last cycle will not be repeated because that cycle’s global building boom – from Shanghai to Dubai – was a once-in-a-lifetime event, characterised in the worst cases by massive empty buildings. Mine supply has also now caught up.

The commentary then goes on to critique Michael Stutchbury’s recent article regarding the Australian housing bubble:

Heavens to Betsy. This column will simply observe that house prices reached unprecedented multiples of income in the last cycle and are now threatening to go higher still. And even in Stutchbury’s own terms the boom is based upon easy money – this time fiscal – the First Home Buyers’ Grant (FHBG). We might also note that it was coupled with the lowest cost of mortgages in fifty years. Let’s call a spade a spade. The FHBG was, in the long run, a calamitous policy. It has re-inflated the great Australian housing bubble, underpinned it with moral hazard and badly compromised monetary options… A historic opportunity to de-risk the Australian economy was missed.

If we learned anything form the GFC it is not to trust financial advice, and John Durie of The Australian analyses where new regulation to protect small investors is headed. “Myriad studies have revealed that 50 per cent of Australian adults don’t understand what 50 per cent means.

Britain Grapples With Debt of Greek Proportions

5 Mar

From the New York Times:

Suddenly, investors are asking if Britain may soon face its own sovereign debt crisis if the government fails to slash its growing budget deficits quickly enough to escape the contagious fears of financial markets.

“If you really want a fiscal problem, look at the U.K.,” said Mark Schofield, a fixed-income strategist at Citigroup. “In Europe, the average deficit is about 6 percent of G.D.P. and in the U.K. it’s 12 percent. It is only just beginning.”

Since the Labour government’s intense fiscal intervention in 2008 and 2009, yields on British government debt have soared to among the highest in Europe. And on a broader scale, which includes the borrowing of households and companies, the overall level of debt in Britain is the second-largest in the world, after Japan’s, at 380 percent of the country’s gross domestic product, according to a recent report by the consulting company McKinsey.

Britain is not in the 16-nation euro zone and, unlike Greece and other struggling countries that use the currency, it retains control over its monetary policy. As a result, it has benefited so far from a huge bond-buying program undertaken by the Bank of England — proportionally, the largest in the world — that has kept mortgage rates and gilt yields at unusually low levels.

That means the government and its citizens have been able to continue to borrow at interest rates that do not reflect their true financial situation.

Indeed, the increase in private and government debt here contrasts sharply with the deleveraging that has been going on in the United States.

British household debt is now 170 percent of overall annual income, compared with 130 percent in the United States. In an echo of the United States’ rush into subprime mortgages with low teaser rates, millions of homeowners in Britain have piled into variable-rate mortgages that are linked to the rock-bottom base rate.

As for the British government, it has been able to finance a budget deficit of 12.5 percent of G.D.P. — equal to Greece’s — at an interest rate more than two full percentage points lower only because the Bank of England bought the majority of the bonds it issued last year.

Sound familiar?

In Australia, household debt is over 150 per cent of income. And in an echo of the British rush into US-style sub-prime mortgages with low teaser rates, some 250,000 homeowners in Australia have piled into variable-rate mortgages that are linked to the rock-bottom base rate, until recently the lowest in 50 years. Many highly ‘marginal’ borrowers who could not previously even raise a deposit, were lured into mortgage debt by the Rudd Government’s First Home Owners Boost, plus additional state-based grants.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started