Tag Archives: debt

Barnaby: “Waiting For Swan Dude To Mutter The Word ‘Surplus'”

11 Aug

Senator Joyce writes for the Canberra Times (emphasis added):

Debt is now a long-term problem

In the mall outside the City Hall gathered the Socialist Action Alliance; speeches, placards, all fairly predictable, about 80 of them.

The zealot loud hailer core were looking a little tired, and a bit passe, but the students were revelling in experimenting with another illicit substance, communism.

Across from them was the Ban the Burka group. There were fewer of them, all in blue, special King Gee Ban the Burka shirts with a motif on them that looked like they wished to ban Pac Man.

Then there was just a cacophony of noise which, from where I was standing, while waiting for my wife and daughter to return from a shop, sounded something along the lines of “Bigot stoning Moslem ban”. The amalgam of the two mantras had led to a perfectly reasonable request.

Into the midst of this came another undergraduate dressed all in black with a cape and a black-winged motorbike helmet. “Bat Thief” was emblazoned across his chest.

He cut quite a dashing figure. Beside him stood plain clothes Boy Wonder with a placard on a stick offering “free hugs”. They were obviously a duo – it was outside City Hall after all.

Bat Thief stood beside me, observed the scene and muttered “racism”.

Which group he was referring to and exactly what he was going to do next shall remain a mystery.

Anyway it appeared to be either too much or too inconsequential for Bat Thief.

He and his coterie of skateboard super heroes exited behind the Ban Pac Man crowd.

The constabulary was also there and had managed to apprehend three felons; the charge, riding a push bike in the mall, mitigated by their combined ages being less than that of the youngest protester.

This was the day that Standard & Poor’s downgraded the US Government. The mall appeared oblivious to the fact that the world had changed. A fire that was lit by debt and had never gone out had come raging back over the horizon and could financially take all before it.

Australia has been distracted from the main issue. I have more faith in Bat Thief and the Free Hugs boy wonder than I do in Wayne and Julia to get us through this one.

If you put your face too close to the painting you can’t see the picture, and to see this picture you have to go back to 2008.

I remember reading some very prescient articles that formulated my belief that debt had gone from a transient problem to a long-term structural problem.

William White, from the Bank of International Settlements, started to raise serious concerns about interbank liquidity. Dr Paul Woolley and Eric Janszen argued that people had been borrowing money to gamble on derivatives. A very dangerous thing.

I remember when studying for my CPA, it was one of the first lessons taught, learning that Toyota once decided they could make more money trading options than selling cars and almost went broke. Unfortunately we had whole nations trying to do it.

It always amazed me that if a humble accountant from St George was reading this then why wasn’t the Treasurer? At the time he seemed too busy fighting a war on inflation, in an attempt to embarrass the previous government, rather than tackle the problems facing the world.

Now, the problem then was debt and the problem now is debt.

Southern Europe doesn’t want to pay their taxes but they want the social protections of a benevolent government. The problem for the Germans is that they are sick of bailing them out. They may no longer have a choice because the problem is becoming too big for anyone.

America’s debt is at a level that is beyond the human mind to actually fathom; it has become a form of mathematical metaphysics worthy of Donne or Dryden.

Here in Australia we are led by an apparently fiscally conservative government that has increased public debt by 150 per cent since 2007.

Only those other noted fiscal conservative governments in Iceland and Ireland have grown their debt at a faster rate.

Our Treasurer’s promise to deliver a surplus is as much of a show as Bat Thief’s cape and skateboard trick. I am waiting for Swan dude to mutter the word “surplus” and then disappear down the street with the Labor party on their skateboards.

Money Morning Agrees – Your Retirement Savings Under Threat

22 Jul

Sorry dear reader. I’ve simply been too busy trying to get this NGER Register debunking research finished to offer you anything original today.

But in a timely and thematically happy coincidence, the estimable authors of Money Morning yesterday published their must-read free newsletter on a topic that has been covered at length right here on barnabyisright.com.

The coming theft of your super by our government.

Below I’ve taken the liberty of quoting some of Money Morning’s commentary on this topic, along with a link to their complete article.

h/t to Twitterer @Kmorefive for bringing this to my attention:

Special Report: Your Retirement Savings are Under Threat

A week ago we got an email from the Australian Treasury.

It was titled: “Exposure Draft – Legislative Framework for Public Ancillary Funds”

In a moment we’ll explain why that email is more proof the federal government secretly plans the wholesale taking of individuals’ retirement savings.

Normally these Treasury emails are dull.

And this one was no different.

In fact, the email’s headline is usually enough to put us off reading further.

But this time, something made us look.  Perhaps it was the words “public” and “funds”.

So we read the document… we didn’t like what we saw…

In our view, this is the next step in the federal government’s plans to nationalise retirement savings.  We’ve been ahead of the game on this for the past three years.

We warned bureaucrats and politicians regret giving up control of retirement money.  That there’s a big stack of cash – $1.3 trillion – the government can’t easily get hold of.

But over two years ago, things started to change.

It started with the government and Australian Taxation Office (ATO) taking the unclaimed superannuation accounts of foreign temporary workers.

Over $700 million of private savings was “transferred” to the federal government’s coffers.  But the government didn’t invest it.  Instead, it went to consolidated revenue.  Consolidated revenue is the government’s day-to-day spending.

In other words, private retirement savings have been taken to fund the public service… while at the same time leaving the taxpayer on the hook to repay $700 million if the foreign workers ever ask for their money back.

Who says governments plan for the long term!

But that wasn’t the end of it.  The next step was to grab Australians’ retirement savings… under the ruse it’s too expensive for private funds to take care of unclaimed accounts… only the government can do that… apparently!

Back-door savings grab

And now, the next stage of the retirement grab is in train… with your savings next in line for the government’s sticky-fingers treatment…

We’ve seen the nationalisation of retirement funds in Australia (examples above).  And it’s happened overseas: Argentina, Ireland and Hungary are just three examples.

But now, with the proposed amendments to Public Ancillary Funds, Australia is set to follow suit.

The call for more public spending on infrastructure gives the government a perfect excuse.  And the country’s biggest and most influential bodies will help – namely the banking and funds management industries and the trade unions.

Beware government offering gifts

Stock market volatility and low savings means many realise they can’t retire without government help.  Public Ancillary Funds are the answer to the government’s problem.  They’ll enable individuals to make voluntary “donations” to the State.  In return for receiving extra credits for the State Pension.

Notice we say voluntary.  That’s how it’ll start.  But odds are that won’t be enough to raise the billions of dollars the government needs to fund its programmes and welfare.

The next – and inevitable – stage is for compulsory investment in Public Ancillary Funds.  Most likely through the back door.  Such as requiring private fund managers to hold a percentage of assets in Public Ancillary Funds.

[click here to read the complete article]

I wonder if the fine lads at Money Morning are aware of the Liberal Party’s quiet, unnoticed-by-all policy announcement on June 3, which is in my opinion by far the clearest harbinger yet of the super theft to come?

Please do take the time to read over just some of the many articles that I have written previously on this very same topic.

And please do especially note the fact that both major parties have clear policy plans already in train, to get their hands on your super –

No Super For You!!

Liberal Party’s Sneaky Plan To Steal Your Super To Pay Labor’s Debt

Why They Are Planning To Steal Your Super, Explained In 4 Simple Charts

US Treasury “Borrowing” Of Federal Pensions Brings Theft Of Private Pensions One Step Closer

Now The UK Government Is Stealing Super Too

Bankers – The Root Of Evil

11 May

Banking was conceived in iniquity and born in sin. The Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take away that power, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear — as they ought to in order to make this a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of Bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let them continue to create deposits.

Sir Josiah Stamp (1880-1941), one time governor of the Bank of England, in his Commencement Address at the University of Texas in 1927. Reportedly he was the second wealthiest individual in Britain.

Bankers have become even more ‘sophisticated’ in the many decades since Sir Josiah Stamp let the cat out of the bag. Now, not only do they create ‘money’ out of thin air by signing you up to a loan – which is entered into a computer as a brand new “deposit” for you to spend – they also ‘manufacture’ all kinds of ‘synthetic’ money substitutes too.

They’re called “derivatives”. Or, as Warren Buffet called them, “Financial weapons of mass destruction”.

And bankers can create as many of them as they wish, because there is absolutely zero regulation of the derivatives markets. To give you some idea, at the peak of the first wave of the GFC in 2008, there was around 1.44 Quadrillion $USD worth of OTC (“Over The Counter”) derivatives in existence.

Why is this important?

Because the $1 Trillion funding to save the Eurozone announced yesterday is meaningless.  The Eurozone cannot be saved, no matter how much money the EU tries to beg, borrow, steal… or print.  Because banksters like Goldman Sachs can simply create ever greater mountains of ‘synthetic’ derivatives with which to attack debt-laden countries, one by one, starting with the weakest.

From ZeroHedge:

Jim Rickards: “Goldman Can Create Shorts Faster Than Europe Can Print Money”

Jim Rickards, who recently has gotten massive media exposure on everything from the JPM Silver manipulation scandal, to the Greek default, was back on CNBC earlier with one of the most fascinating insights we have yet heard from anyone, which demonstrates beyond a doubt why any attempt by Europe to print its way out of its current default is doomed: “Look at what Soros did to the Bank of England in 1992 – he went after them, they had a finite amount of dollars, he was selling sterling and taking the dollars, and they were buying the sterling and selling the dollars to defend the peg. All he had to do was sell more than they had and he wins. But he needed real money to do that. Today you can break a country, you don’t need money you just need synthetic euroshorts or CDS. A trillion dollar bailout: Goldman can create 10 trillion of euroshorts. So it just dominates whatever governments can do. So basically Goldman can create shorts faster than Europe can create money.

The world is not ruled by politicians.  It is ruled by banksters.  Most of us simply don’t quite understand that, because we don’t understand how they do it.

It is very simple.  Well before most of us were born, bankers were given the exclusive power to create ‘deposits’.  Which you and I know as ‘debt’.  And which is now called ‘credit’ … because it appeals to our Pride, and sounds so much nicer, to delude ourselves that we have been given ‘credit’.

When in reality, what we have been given is a Debt.  By accepting the offer of ‘credit’ (Debt), we sell ourselves as slaves to the bankers.

They know it.  They’ve always known it.

Now you do too.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started